The U.S. Department of Education plays a crucial role in ensuring that students with disabilities receive the support and services they need to succeed in school. Proposals to dismantle or significantly reduce the department’s role have raised concerns about the future of special education in America. This issue explores the potential effects of such changes on students with disabilities and their families.
Understanding Special Education
Special education services are designed to meet the unique needs of students with disabilities. These services are mandated by federal laws such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which requires public schools to provide free and appropriate public education (FAPE) to eligible students. IDEA ensures that students with disabilities have access to educational programs tailored to their needs, including Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) that outline specific goals and services. The Department of Education oversees the implementation of IDEA and provides significant funding to support these efforts. Additionally, the Department of Education helps ensure that schools comply with other federal laws, such as Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, which protects students from discrimination based on disability.
Motivations Behind Dismantling the Department of Education
The initiative to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education is led by President Donald Trump, who has fulfilled a long-standing campaign promise by signing an executive order aimed at beginning the process of eliminating the department. This move is part of a broader effort to shift educational governance back to the states, a stance supported by many Republican lawmakers who argue that federal involvement in education should be minimized. Proponents of dismantling the department believe that state-level governance will allow for more localized decision-making and reduce what they perceive as federal overreach in education policy.
However, critics argue that this approach could undermine national standards for education and lead to significant disparities in educational quality across different states. The dismantling process faces legal and constitutional challenges, as it requires congressional approval to fully abolish the department.
Potential Impact on Special Education Services
Loss of Federal Oversight and Funding
- Federal Funding: The Department of Education provides over $15 billion annually for special education under IDEA. Without federal oversight, states might struggle to maintain consistent standards and funding for these services. This could lead to a reduction in specialized programs and resources available to students with disabilities.
- Consistency Across States: Federal guidelines ensure that special education services are consistent across different states. Without these guidelines, there could be significant disparities in the quality and availability of services, potentially leaving some students behind.
Potential Reduction in Services
- Specialized Services: Special education includes a range of specialized services such as speech therapy, occupational therapy, and behavioral interventions. Without federal requirements, local districts might reduce or eliminate these services, impacting the ability of students with disabilities to fully participate in educational activities.
- Inequity Across Districts: The reduction in services could exacerbate existing inequities between affluent and disadvantaged school districts. Wealthier districts might continue to provide comprehensive services, while less affluent districts might struggle to maintain even basic support.
Legal Protections and Rights
Loss of Protections Against Discrimination
- Legal Safeguards: Federal laws protect students with disabilities from discrimination and ensure their inclusion in mainstream education. Without these protections, students might face segregation or exclusion, undermining their educational and social development.
- Individualized Education Plans (IEPs): IEPs are tailored plans that outline specific educational goals and services for each student with a disability. Without federal rules, districts might not be obligated to provide these plans, leaving students without a clear roadmap for their education.
Operational Challenges
Shift in Responsibility
- State and Local Governance: If the Department of Education’s role is diminished, the responsibility for enforcing special education laws would likely shift to state and local governments. This could lead to inconsistency and confusion, as different regions might interpret laws differently.
- Burden on Families: Families of students with disabilities might face increased burdens in advocating for their children’s rights and services, potentially leading to increased stress and financial strain.
Layoffs and Expertise Loss
- Special Education Staff: Special education teachers and staff are crucial for providing high-quality services. Reduced federal funding could lead to layoffs, impacting the quality of education for students with disabilities.
Dismantling the U.S. Department of Education would have far-reaching and devastating consequences for students with disabilities. The potential loss of federal oversight, funding, and legal protections could lead to reduced services, increased inequity, and diminished educational outcomes. This would not only undermine the progress made in special education but also jeopardize the future of these students by denying them the support they need to succeed. It is imperative that policymakers prioritize the needs and rights of students with disabilities and reject any proposals that could harm their educational opportunities. By maintaining a strong Department of Education, we can ensure that all students, regardless of their abilities, have access to quality education and the chance to reach their full potential. Ultimately, dismantling the Department of Education is not just a policy decision; it is a choice that could profoundly affect the lives of millions of students and their families.
Citations:
- https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2025/03/21/executive-order-aiming-to-close-ed-department-paves-way-to-offload-special-education/31370/
- https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/what-happens-if-the-education-department-is-dissolved
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00144029221148784
- https://www.ndrn.org/resource/ed-eo/
- https://edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai22-578.pdf
- https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/how-dismantling-department-education-would-harm-students
- https://www.vox.com/policy/403596/what-dismantling-the-education-department-means-for-kids-with-disabilities
- https://www.understood.org/en/articles/department-of-education-closes-ieps
- https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63ff39d28fa8f527fb67cb06/SEND_and_alternative_provision_improvement_plan.pdf
- https://edtrust.org/blog/students-with-disabilities-if-department-of-education-dismantled/
- https://www.gov.uk/children-with-special-educational-needs/special-educational-needs-support
- https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/how-dismantling-education-department-could-affect-disabled-students-across-us
- https://www.gov.uk/children-with-special-educational-needs
- https://tcf.org/content/commentary/how-gutting-the-u-s-department-of-education-would-hurt-students-and-their-families/
- https://educationhub.blog.gov.uk/2023/04/what-are-reasonable-adjustments-and-how-do-they-help-disabled-pupils-at-school/
- https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/education-department-layoffs-students-disabilities-rcna196114
- https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/send
- https://www.nea.org/resource-library/how-dismantling-department-education-would-put-our-students-risk
- https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/how-special-education-funding-actually-works/2023/04
- https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/parents-students-disabilities-dont-gut-federal-funding
- https://www.oiahe.org.uk/resources-and-publications/good-practice-framework/supporting-disabled-students/what-does-the-law-say/
- https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556326.pdf
- https://research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/the-legal-rights-of-students-with-disabilities-in-england-special-needs-special-rights(061b2364-7420-4455-8c27-cdcff7acc201).html
- https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/how-schools-make-up-for-the-feds-unfulfilled-special-ed-funding-commitment/2025/02
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/childrens-rights-and-the-developing-law/educational-rights-for-children-with-disabilities/E532488DA270D628041C6D45376B6B22
- https://bellwether.org/publications/who-pays-for-special-education/
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09687599.2024.2411148
- https://surreyeducationservices.surreycc.gov.uk/Article/169136
- https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-students/equal-opportunities/disabled-students/
- https://educationhub.blog.gov.uk/2024/03/improving-support-children-young-people-special-education-needs-send/
- https://www.neari.org/advocating-change/new-from-neari/how-dismantling-department-education-would-harm-students
- https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Disabled-Children-and-the-Equality-Act-2010-Guide-for-Teachers.pdf
- https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/66384/7/Disability%20and%20Society%20Time%20for%20justice%20proof%20read.pdf
- https://www.gov.uk/rights-disabled-person/education-rights
